
The Portuguese Communist Party and the Left Bloc plan to return to Parliament with proposals to reimburse approximately 450 former Portuguese employees of Lajes Air Base for pension reductions applied between 2015 and 2023. Their demands also revive concerns about environmental contamination on Terceira and the importance of involving former workers in efforts to understand its consequences.
Some debts are measured in money; others are measured in the years during which people have waited for a resolution. On Terceira, approximately 450 former Portuguese employees of Lajes Air Base continue to seek reimbursement for reductions applied to their retirement pensions following the downsizing of the American military presence. Although the pension penalty known as the sustainability factor ceased to apply to these workers in 2024, the amounts deducted between 2015 and 2023 have not been restored. For the retirees, the question remains unresolved; for two political parties preparing initiatives in the Assembly of the Republic, it has become a matter of retrospective financial redress.
The Portuguese Communist Party (PCP) and the Left Bloc (BE) have announced separate initiatives to address the issue as Portugal considers its 2027 State Budget. Both parties argue that eliminating the pension reduction prospectively, without reimbursing the amounts previously deducted, leaves a significant part of workers’ claims unanswered. Their proposals concern employees whose retirement followed the reduction of the United States’ military presence at Lajes, an event that profoundly affected employment and economic life in parts of Terceira.
Marco Varela, regional coordinator of the PCP in the Azores, met with former base workers and representatives of SITACEHTT, the trade union representing workers across several industrial and service sectors, at the headquarters of the Angra do Heroísmo Trade Union. The retirees requested the meeting, which examined the continuing consequences of the sustainability factor. Varela described reimbursement as a matter of justice and announced that the PCP would coordinate with its parliamentary group to submit a proposal during the State Budget debate, while seeking support from other parties. He emphasized that workers have pursued this demand for years and that the PCP has supported their efforts regionally and nationally.
António Lima, representing the Left Bloc, also met with former Lajes employees and confirmed that his party intends to pursue the reimbursement through the 2027 State Budget. In his assessment, the 2024 change corrected the ongoing application of the penalty but did not address its earlier financial consequences. Lima argued that the overall cost would be relatively modest within the scale of the national budget, although the amounts involved remain significant to individual retirees. The BE also intends to introduce a separate legislative proposal that would allow Azorean representatives in the national Parliament to participate directly in the discussion and vote.
The dispute illustrates a broader question about the responsibilities that remain after major institutional and economic changes. For decades, Lajes Air Base employed Portuguese workers whose professional lives became closely connected to the strategic relationship between Portugal and the United States. When that presence contracted, the consequences extended beyond the military installation itself, affecting households, employment opportunities and retirement decisions. The former workers’ present demand concerns whether the pension arrangements applied during that transition should now be reconsidered for the years preceding the 2024 correction.
The meetings also returned to another unresolved dimension of the American military presence: contamination of soil and groundwater associated with Lajes Air Base. Varela called for a comprehensive environmental study covering Terceira and argued that former employees could provide knowledge to the regional commission responsible for monitoring the issue. António Lima likewise supported their participation, emphasizing that workers familiar with past operations may be able to identify substances used. At these locations, contamination may have occurred, and procedures may have been followed over the years. Such testimony, both parties suggested, could contribute to a more informed and scientifically grounded assessment, alongside environmental sampling and technical investigation.
These two concerns—pensions and environmental contamination—are distinct in their legal and technical dimensions, but they share a common historical origin. Both concern consequences of a military presence that shaped Terceira’s economy, society, and relationship with the wider Atlantic world. Both also raise questions about how the experience and knowledge of those who worked at the base should inform decisions made long after their employment ended.
For now, the proposed pension reimbursements remain political initiatives rather than approved measures. Their outcome will depend on parliamentary consideration, the final legislative provisions and the support they receive during the 2027 budget process.
Yet the former workers’ continuing efforts remind us that the consequences of historical decisions do not necessarily end when policies change, or institutions reduce their presence. They remain in retirement incomes, in the memories of those who worked behind the gates, and in the environmental questions that still require answers.
For Terceira, Lajes’s history is not confined to the past. It continues wherever those who helped sustain that history seek recognition, accountability, and a resolution to what they believe remains unfinished.
Based on a story from Diário Insular-José Lourenço, director. Photo from JEdgardo Vieira.
